
The Jo-Jo King Case: Does This Story Add Up?
Six-year-old Jo-Jo King III died on February 23, 2020, after being found unresponsive in his Grand Prairie, Texas home with a claimed toy chest entrapment
This Crime Junkie investigation episode explores the power of the Freedom of Information Act as a tool for uncovering hidden evidence and investigative failures in cold cases. Through FOIA requests, the hosts examine three real cases where government records reveal critical details that were initially overlooked, improperly preserved, or never tested. The episode demonstrates how persistence in demanding transparency can change the trajectory of investigations that have gone dormant for decades. The first case focuses on Kristin David, a 22-year-old who disappeared while biking along Highway 95 between Moscow and Lewiston, Idaho, on June 26, 1981. Her remains were discovered in the Snake River days later. Through FOIA requests, the team obtained access to her original case file, including forensic documentation and investigative notes that revealed critical evidence still exists. Most importantly, the files identified a potential crime scene at Sacajawea Lodge that raises significant questions about whether the case has been linked to the wrong suspect all along. This discovery suggests that proper investigation of the lodge location could fundamentally alter the understanding of what happened to Kristin. The second case involves Steven Altman, a 21-year-old found dead in his stepfather's workshop in Chicago, Illinois, in 1984, and his mother Mary Ann Hayes, discovered dead in her Northfield, Illinois, home in 1996. Both deaths were initially ruled as self-inflicted, a conclusion that seemed to close the books on both cases. However, nearly three decades later, Steven's sister Robin Altman filed FOIA requests that uncovered shocking information. Steven's case had virtually no preserved records, raising questions about investigative documentation standards. Even more disturbing, Mary Ann's case contained unknown male DNA that was never tested or analyzed. These discoveries led to both cases being reopened and exposed how crucial evidence had been systematically overlooked for decades. The episode emphasizes that FOIA requests, while not always returning complete answers, can serve as a crucial mechanism for citizens to demand accountability from government agencies. When answers don't add up, filing FOIA requests can reveal whether investigative gaps resulted from incompetence, negligence, or worse. The hosts demonstrate that families and independent researchers who refuse to accept official narratives at face value can use legal tools to push for deeper examination of cases that authorities may have prematurely closed.
“When the answers don't add up, we go deeper”
“The Freedom of Information Act gives anyone the legal right to request records from government agencies”
“Sometimes FOIA requests uncover details that completely change a case”
“Critical evidence still exists that was never properly preserved or tested”
“Nearly 30 years later, FOIA requests exposed how key evidence had been overlooked for decades”